An interrupting memory may store for the day in every week until today ,yesterday & tomorrow . Past is dead , future is equal distance forwarding to far away.
Tough time with confidence take it all the eternity even Sin relating to easy pass throughout being a type of Newmen which benefit of T without jealousy of doubtless ,bring a recent time seemed we pass a long year before yesterday!
Success ,surprises on the way in particular development of a inter world society with god forces or any real blissfulness .
we proud of it for anything without any pair of intimacy!
Taken from universal unit & unity!
[This is a breaking news post, which we will be updating as more information comes in.]
Tensions between Bay Area activists and tech institutions ratcheted up this morning when protestors attacked a Google bus in West Oakland, smashing the bus’s rear window while Google employees were inside. Local news organization KQED reports that Google has confirmed the attack.
One Google employee took to Twitter to post evidence of the encounter. A picture shows protestors standing in front of the bus holding a sign that says, “Fuck Off Google.”
Protestors published a colorful account of the incident on local forum IndyBay.org: “[A] person appeared from behind the bus and quickly smashed the whole of the rear window, making glass rain down on the street. Cold air blew inside the bus and the blockaders with their banners departed. The kind young man left the bus and outside someone threw fliers with a smiley face logo and the message ‘disrupt google’ into the air.”
Two blockades of tech company buses were planned this morning, one in San Francisco and the other in West Oakland. The San Francisco group was organized by a loose coalition of housing activists, including representatives from Eviction Free SF, Our Mission No Eviction, and Just Cause. For the SF protest, roughly 100 people showed up and blocked an Apple bus for 30 minutes.
The spokesperson for the San Francisco group, Fred Sherburn-Zimmer, claims the two protests were not connected. “I have no idea who is organizing the West Oakland protest,” she says. “We just heard a rumor it was happening a few days ago and thought it was perfect timing since the same pressures are happening on both sides of the bay.”
Based on the activists’ account themselves, it appears the rowdier West Oakland protest was a smaller group. The IndyBay.org account said:
Erin Mcelroy, another member of the SF activist coalition, was surprised to hear about the West Oakland’s protest approach. “I just found out about it now,” she says. “I had no idea that they had done that.”
She called it a different level of civil disobedience, and explained that it makes sense given that rising rents in SF lead to the same thing happening in Oakland as people move there. “I’m excited that different groups are forming and mobilizing in different ways,” Mcelroy says. “Obviously our approach is different to their’s but it’s important to link gentrification in the East Bay to gentrification in SF.”
Today’s blockades come at a time of increasing tension between some San Francisco residents and larger Silicon Valley organizations.
As the tech industry is growing in size, wealth, and power, it attracts more people to the SF Bay Area and decreases the amount of available housing. Some San Francisco and East Bay residents are getting pushed out of the cities they live in because they can no longer afford rent. Likewise, some landlords are taking advantage of a law called the Ellis Act to force long time residents out and sell the property for high rates.
Many employees who work for Google, Apple, Facebook, LinkedIn, and other tech companies based on the Peninsula live in San Francisco or the East Bay. They take shuttles run by the corporations from these locations down to work in Menlo Park, Palo Alto, and Mountain View.
As a result, the private shuttles have become a symbol of the socioeconomic conflict unfolding in the Bay Area. Protestors have blockaded tech company buses on previous instances before today, most notably a few weeks ago when a fake video went viral online. The clip showed a supposed Google employee shouting back at protestors, “You can’t afford it? You can leave.” The man turned out to be a union organizer performing a bit of activist theater.
The smashing of the Google bus window today marks the first time the anti-eviction movement has used physically aggressive tactics, although in May between 30 and 40 protesters in San Francisco’s Mission district attacked a piñata in the form of a Google bus.
“The scent of sage was strong, but the revolution was falling short,” noted blogger Kevin Montgomery, who witnessed the attack on the defenseless paper mache.
Now, it seems, at least one of the protest groups has graduated to vandalism.
[Image credit: Craig Frost]
ricekrispytweet
SovietSpirit
geonomist
cynicalyricist
2bitarchitect
Tough time with confidence take it all the eternity even Sin relating to easy pass throughout being a type of Newmen which benefit of T without jealousy of doubtless ,bring a recent time seemed we pass a long year before yesterday!
Success ,surprises on the way in particular development of a inter world society with god forces or any real blissfulness .
we proud of it for anything without any pair of intimacy!
Taken from universal unit & unity!
BREAKING: Protesters attack Google bus in West Oakland, smashing window
[This is a breaking news post, which we will be updating as more information comes in.]
Tensions between Bay Area activists and tech institutions ratcheted up this morning when protestors attacked a Google bus in West Oakland, smashing the bus’s rear window while Google employees were inside. Local news organization KQED reports that Google has confirmed the attack.
One Google employee took to Twitter to post evidence of the encounter. A picture shows protestors standing in front of the bus holding a sign that says, “Fuck Off Google.”
Protestors published a colorful account of the incident on local forum IndyBay.org: “[A] person appeared from behind the bus and quickly smashed the whole of the rear window, making glass rain down on the street. Cold air blew inside the bus and the blockaders with their banners departed. The kind young man left the bus and outside someone threw fliers with a smiley face logo and the message ‘disrupt google’ into the air.”
Two blockades of tech company buses were planned this morning, one in San Francisco and the other in West Oakland. The San Francisco group was organized by a loose coalition of housing activists, including representatives from Eviction Free SF, Our Mission No Eviction, and Just Cause. For the SF protest, roughly 100 people showed up and blocked an Apple bus for 30 minutes.
The spokesperson for the San Francisco group, Fred Sherburn-Zimmer, claims the two protests were not connected. “I have no idea who is organizing the West Oakland protest,” she says. “We just heard a rumor it was happening a few days ago and thought it was perfect timing since the same pressures are happening on both sides of the bay.”
Based on the activists’ account themselves, it appears the rowdier West Oakland protest was a smaller group. The IndyBay.org account said:
At 8:15, a small group of people met at 7th and Adeline in West Oakland. Down the street, over 20 employees of Google were queued up, waiting for their giant white bus to take them to their Mountain View headquarters. When it arrived, a kind young man, homeless and unemployed, boarded the bus with the employees. While they took their seats, several people unfurled two giant banners reading “TECHIES: Your World Is Not Welcome Here” and “FUCK OFF GOOGLE.”The San Francisco group declined to condemn the actions of the more aggressive West Oakland activist group. “Rents are going through the roof in both cities, we’re seeing massive levels of eviction,” Sherburn-Zimmer says. “It’s understandable that people are angry on both sides of the bay.”
Erin Mcelroy, another member of the SF activist coalition, was surprised to hear about the West Oakland’s protest approach. “I just found out about it now,” she says. “I had no idea that they had done that.”
She called it a different level of civil disobedience, and explained that it makes sense given that rising rents in SF lead to the same thing happening in Oakland as people move there. “I’m excited that different groups are forming and mobilizing in different ways,” Mcelroy says. “Obviously our approach is different to their’s but it’s important to link gentrification in the East Bay to gentrification in SF.”
Today’s blockades come at a time of increasing tension between some San Francisco residents and larger Silicon Valley organizations.
As the tech industry is growing in size, wealth, and power, it attracts more people to the SF Bay Area and decreases the amount of available housing. Some San Francisco and East Bay residents are getting pushed out of the cities they live in because they can no longer afford rent. Likewise, some landlords are taking advantage of a law called the Ellis Act to force long time residents out and sell the property for high rates.
Many employees who work for Google, Apple, Facebook, LinkedIn, and other tech companies based on the Peninsula live in San Francisco or the East Bay. They take shuttles run by the corporations from these locations down to work in Menlo Park, Palo Alto, and Mountain View.
As a result, the private shuttles have become a symbol of the socioeconomic conflict unfolding in the Bay Area. Protestors have blockaded tech company buses on previous instances before today, most notably a few weeks ago when a fake video went viral online. The clip showed a supposed Google employee shouting back at protestors, “You can’t afford it? You can leave.” The man turned out to be a union organizer performing a bit of activist theater.
The smashing of the Google bus window today marks the first time the anti-eviction movement has used physically aggressive tactics, although in May between 30 and 40 protesters in San Francisco’s Mission district attacked a piñata in the form of a Google bus.
“The scent of sage was strong, but the revolution was falling short,” noted blogger Kevin Montgomery, who witnessed the attack on the defenseless paper mache.
Now, it seems, at least one of the protest groups has graduated to vandalism.
[Image credit: Craig Frost]
What
a depressing thread. Those who don’t understand the laws of economics
have made up some crazy theories of what they think is going on.
Meh... Isn't capitalism all about "Earn money or die?". I think IT
could pull out some kind of closed city for employees only. As for SF...
could be second Detroit without IT.
Bunk
beds as homes are bad but it’s even worse in Tokyo where traveling
salesmen sleep in drawers. While there may be over population in some
metro areas and too little shelter, there is also wasted land — vacant
lots and under-used lots — and abandoned or near-empty buildings.
Why do owners do that? Many are speculating, waiting to get an even higher offer. But there is a way to prod them to put their land to best use. It’s a method Pittsburgh used when it had the most affordable housing of any major US city (and the by-far lowest crime rate) and even closed its homeless shelter not from lack of funds but from lack of guests, housing was so affordable.
What Pittsburgh did and any city, state, or nation could do is shift their property tax off buildings, onto land. To afford it, owners get busy developing. That increases the housing stock and decreases the housing costs.
That was in the old Steel City, in the Rust Belt, but in the Sun Belt this property tax shift could work even better, precisely because location values are higher. The local government would recover those socially-generated values and distribute the lion’s share to residents. As site values climbed, one’s share of this pie would grow. People could always afford to live where they love, and love where they live.
Shuttle vandalism is mindless. Shelters are helpful but still dealing with symptom, not system. Better than vandalize buses is to geonomize localities at progress.org.
Why do owners do that? Many are speculating, waiting to get an even higher offer. But there is a way to prod them to put their land to best use. It’s a method Pittsburgh used when it had the most affordable housing of any major US city (and the by-far lowest crime rate) and even closed its homeless shelter not from lack of funds but from lack of guests, housing was so affordable.
What Pittsburgh did and any city, state, or nation could do is shift their property tax off buildings, onto land. To afford it, owners get busy developing. That increases the housing stock and decreases the housing costs.
That was in the old Steel City, in the Rust Belt, but in the Sun Belt this property tax shift could work even better, precisely because location values are higher. The local government would recover those socially-generated values and distribute the lion’s share to residents. As site values climbed, one’s share of this pie would grow. People could always afford to live where they love, and love where they live.
Shuttle vandalism is mindless. Shelters are helpful but still dealing with symptom, not system. Better than vandalize buses is to geonomize localities at progress.org.
Can
someone please confirm that, after they attacked the Google bus, those
protestors tweeted their exploits using their Android phones? I NEED TO
KNOW!
not
condoning the vandalism act that took place. The employees here are
somewhat unlucky to be part of a bigger conflict. Also I don't think
even google reads or listens anymore since they are so big now. I had to
move out of an apartment complex because every 6 months they hiked up
the rent in SF about $500-$800 because of Google and other tech
companies rented apartments over there. As a recent college graduate,
with an entry level job, i had worked out all of my expenses between
rent and travel time and all necessary things to keep going at the
current or slightly increased rent for at least until i get my next
promotion. Turns out, when my contract needed renewal 1 year later, the
complex literally told me to move out because they had higher price tags
and more tech employees coming in. I couldn't even afford it anymore,
and yes I HAD A JOB! This is what happens when you ignore people who are
just trying to make a living.
Now attacking a bus. Not a good idea. But it is understandable and some people may have a job situation they literally CAN NOT find a solution to, sadly because employers aren't reasonable with salaries these days either. If the government cared they would limit the rents in both cities and address the situation before the whole of SF and Oakland become a new Levittown for Silicon Valley.
FYI: people should stop calling this "domestic terrorism" and begin to address WHY this happened instead of WHAT happened.
Now attacking a bus. Not a good idea. But it is understandable and some people may have a job situation they literally CAN NOT find a solution to, sadly because employers aren't reasonable with salaries these days either. If the government cared they would limit the rents in both cities and address the situation before the whole of SF and Oakland become a new Levittown for Silicon Valley.
FYI: people should stop calling this "domestic terrorism" and begin to address WHY this happened instead of WHAT happened.
How Google Lost Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars in an Hour and Half
- |
- 5:57 pm |
- Permalink
For a brief window this morning, something strange happened to the internet.
At approximately 9:15am ET, display ads disappeared across mega-trafficked media websites such as BuzzFeed, Time, Forbes, Gawker and Vox, replaced instead by big, blank spaces. Some were understandably pleased at the mini-vacation they got from companies making money from their eyeballs, but those running the websites weren’t so happy—and neither was Google. It was the one who was supposed to supply those ads.
The end result? A ton of lost money for all those websites—and for Google. How much? That’s hard to say. But Google alone likely lost several hundred thousands dollars in about an hour and a half—and the other sites lost a comparable amount, if not more.
In the wake of the ads outage, Google scrambled to figure out what caused it, and by 10:45am, most websites were back to normal. Google posted a quick memo—which reads like a sigh of relief—saying things were back up and running.
The glitch was caused by the ad tool called DoubleClick for Publishers, or DFP—a Google advertising service used by many websites to manage ad operations, and whose content is hosted on Google machines rather than the servers that hold the publisher’s own content.
Google says it doesn’t publicly reveal its revenue stream for DoubleClick for Publishers, instead lumping it in under “other” revenue on its earnings reports. That includes anything that doesn’t come from ad revenue on its own websites or from websites that use its AdSense ad network. Based on the company’s 2013 annual report, it made $568,000 per hour in “other” revenue across the internet. Though this includes more than DoubleClick dollars, we can roughly estimate that the company lost something approaching $1 million from this morning’s ad server hiccup.
The last time Google’s DFP system failed was more than a year ago, in March 2013, when the service was down for several hours. This sort of outage may please you in some way, but don’t get used to it. The internet, after all, runs on ads.
At approximately 9:15am ET, display ads disappeared across mega-trafficked media websites such as BuzzFeed, Time, Forbes, Gawker and Vox, replaced instead by big, blank spaces. Some were understandably pleased at the mini-vacation they got from companies making money from their eyeballs, but those running the websites weren’t so happy—and neither was Google. It was the one who was supposed to supply those ads.
The end result? A ton of lost money for all those websites—and for Google. How much? That’s hard to say. But Google alone likely lost several hundred thousands dollars in about an hour and a half—and the other sites lost a comparable amount, if not more.
In the wake of the ads outage, Google scrambled to figure out what caused it, and by 10:45am, most websites were back to normal. Google posted a quick memo—which reads like a sigh of relief—saying things were back up and running.
The glitch was caused by the ad tool called DoubleClick for Publishers, or DFP—a Google advertising service used by many websites to manage ad operations, and whose content is hosted on Google machines rather than the servers that hold the publisher’s own content.
Google says it doesn’t publicly reveal its revenue stream for DoubleClick for Publishers, instead lumping it in under “other” revenue on its earnings reports. That includes anything that doesn’t come from ad revenue on its own websites or from websites that use its AdSense ad network. Based on the company’s 2013 annual report, it made $568,000 per hour in “other” revenue across the internet. Though this includes more than DoubleClick dollars, we can roughly estimate that the company lost something approaching $1 million from this morning’s ad server hiccup.
The last time Google’s DFP system failed was more than a year ago, in March 2013, when the service was down for several hours. This sort of outage may please you in some way, but don’t get used to it. The internet, after all, runs on ads.
We Recommend
Arnab Goswami insults Kill Dil stars Ranveer Singh, Parineeti Chopra: Watch TVF’s Barely Speaking with Arnub
Oh My God! is the first reaction when
you watch the latest video by TVF’s Barely Speaking With Arnub as poor
man’s Arnab Goswami ripped the Kill Dil star cast apart barring Ali Zafar. After Shah Rukh Khan became a part of TVF in their last video, the young stars of Kill Dil
– Ranveer Singh, Parineeti Chopra and Ali Zafar would have thought of
as a great medium for promotions. But our man, Arnub has nailed them by
insulting them left, right and centre.
The video starts with Ranveer Singh
being mistaken as Roadies fame Rannvijay Singh and later being taunted
as “an actor with a face that is good enough to be on TV”. Parineeti Chopra was slammed as Priyanka Chopra’s beta version and Ali Zafar is called South East Asia’s Justin Timberlake! The whole video has Arnub killing the Kill Dil lead actors with rather offensive remarks till Pakistani actor Ali Zafar makes a comeback by calling him an ‘idiot’.
So if you really are not fans of Ranveer Singh, Parineeti Chopra or Ali Zafar, then this video is a must watch for you as there are some classic insults.
P.S. Biswapati Sarkar or Arnub with ‘U’, we hope to see you nailing Arnab with ‘A’.
FROM THE WEBFROM INDIA.COM
No comments:
Post a Comment